![]() These are the kinds of speeds I expected. Today, as part of work, I cloned a Samsung ST1000LM024 1TB HDD to a Crucial CT1000MX200SSD1 1TB SSD in a Lenovo B5400 80B6 running Windows 8.1 Pro which was plagued with problems but after fixing the boot records I ran a 3 1GiB (default) CrystalDiskMark 64-bit version 4.0.3a test:. Each program does open much quicker after the startup has completed but I still wouldn't say lightning quick. Opened iTunes.Īdmittedly, I do have quite a few startup items and Google Chrome extensions. Opened Outlook 2013 (2 email accounts between 1 GB and 2 GB each). I will also time my initial system and program startup to get a more specific idea of the performance. So, as it's a whole number, the sectors are aligned? Update 8 00:46: In response to and > Components > Storage > Disks reports the SanDisk SDSSDP128G ATA Device's Partition Starting Offset value as 105,906,176 bytes. WinDirStat version 1.1.2.80 scan of the SSD post-cleanup (27.8% free): Update 7 18:57: In further response to version 1.1.2.80 scan of the SSD pre-cleanup (~8.8% free): It currently has 10.1GB of 119GB free (8.5%).Ī 3 1GiB (default) CrystalDiskMark 64-bit version 4.0.3a test on the SSD: -ĬrystalDiskMark 4.0.3 圆4 (C) 2007-2015 hiyohiyo If I recall correctly, there has never been a performance increase, even when Windows was freshly installed and, therefore, barely using any of the available storage. "Did the performance decrease as storage usage increased?" No, but, from what I've read, doing so can be counterproductive, even with an SSD. Update 6 22:34: In response to and the SysMain (Superfetch) service disabled?" See Sandisk Pulse 128GB 2.5inch SSD - EbuyerĪ scan with SSDLife Free version 2.5.82 says it's absolutely fine but is missing a few details: "Are there any related Error or Warning System events?" No, but I believe that wouldn't cause a performance decrease (or lack thereof) like this. "Is the defragsvc (Disk Defragmenter) service disabled?" fsutil behavior query DisableDeleteNotify reports 0. It wasn't for a long time but I enabled it in the BIOS and tweaked the registry to force the install of compatible drivers in Windows a few months ago and it didn't made a difference. The SSD order acknowledgement email is dated 3 and wmic os get installdate reports 20130117141810.000000+000 so that would suggest so but I am one for imaging (of which I usually use Acronis True Image) and I doubt imaging would change that date but I will answer imaging-related questions too just in case. OS : Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 (圆4)Įven though those stats aren't terrible, it really doesn't seem like the system is operating at that capacity and, according to Kingston SSDNow V300 PCSTATS Review - SSD Benchmarks: CrystalDiskMark 3, AS SSD, others have had significantly better results than I have with SSD performance.Ĭomparatively, a 5 1000MB CrystalDiskMark 64-bit version 3.0.3.b test (same as above) on the HDD:. I upgraded my Windows 7 PC from a Samsung Spinpoint F4EG HD204UI HDD to a SanDisk Pulse SDSSDP-128G-G25 SSD but, unlike seemingly everyone else in the world, I have never noticed a performance increase - system or program startup, etc.Ī 5 1000MB CrystalDiskMark 64-bit version 3.0.3.b test on the SSD: -ĬrystalDiskMark 3.0.3 圆4 (C) 2007-2013 hiyohiyo
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |